Sparkfun MPU9250 Test with Teensy 3.2

Posted 15 September 2019

After successfully demonstrating heading-based wall following with my little two motor robot, I attempted to integrate this capability back into my newly re-engined (re-motored??) 4-wheel Wall-E2 robot. Naturally the attempt was a dismal failure, for reasons I have yet to determine.  For some reason, the MPU 6050 IMU on the 4-wheel robot refused to produce valid heading data, and when I then attempted to redo the previously successful experiment on my 2-wheel robot, it too failed – in the same manner!  Clearly the two robots got together and decided to misbehave just to watch me tear what’s left of my hair out!

So, after trying in vain to figure out WTF with respect to the two robots and their respective IMU’s, I decided to just start all over with a different controller and a different IMU and see if I could just make something positive happen.  I found a Sparkfun MPU 9250 IMU breakout board in my parts bin, left over from an older post.  Because the Sparkfun board is set up for 3.3V only, I decided to use a Teensy controller instead of an Arduino Mega and see if I could just get something to work.

After the usual number of screwups and frustrations, I was finally able to get the Sparkfun MPU 9250 breakout board and the Teensy 3.2 talking to each other and to capture some valid heading (yaw) data from the MPU 9250.  The reason for this post is to document the setup and the code so when I have this same problem a year from now, I can come back here and have a working, documented baseline to start with.

The Hardware:

I used a Teensy 3.2 and a Sparkfun MPU 9250 IMU breakout board, both mounted on a small ASP solderless breadboard, as shown in the following photo, along with a Fritzing view of the layout

The Software:

I wrote a short program to display heading (yaw) values from the 9250, as shown below. The program uses Brian (nox771)’s wonderful i2c_t3 I2C library for the Teensy 3.x & LC controllers, and a modified version of ‘Class_MPU9250BasicAHRS_t3.h/cpp that incorporates an adaptation of Sebastian Madgwick’s “…efficient orientation filter” for 6D0F vs 9DOF.  The modification removes the magnetometer information from the calculations, as I already know that the magnetic field in my environment is corrupted with house wiring and is unreliable.

The modified Madgwick routine is included below

Note to self; after reviewing the extensive email thread with Kris Winer (tleracorp@gmail.com) I now believe I encapsulated all the required modifications to the AHRS code into a new class called “Class_MPU9250BasicAHRS_t3” with Class_MPU9250BasicAHRS_t3.h & .cpp files, and then referenced this new class in my MPU9250 work.

The results:

After getting everything working (and figuring out the history), I finally started getting reliable heading data from the MPU9250 as shown in the following Excel plot, where the breadboard was manually rotated back and forth.

Stay tuned,

 

Frank

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *